• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki coder vs provider

bpross10

Guest
Messages
22
Best answers
0
I am looking for information that states it is better to have a coder code records than a provider.

Does anyone know where to find?
 
Actually, you can go to the Corporate AAPC site and there's this article:

http://healthdatamanagement.com/html/current/CurrentIssueStory.cfm?articleId=15830

Sheri Bernard Poe, one of our AAPC leaders makes some comments that I completely agree with in that article.

That's not much, but it'll at least give you a somewhere to start.

One argument you might consider is that the Federal Payers review coding and charts by means of coders (not solely, but in addition to others). It is more likely two coders (who intimately know the rules, audit records and work the systems) are going to see things in a similar fashion than a physician "coder" doing the work. Just my personal opinion.

By the way, you might be able to work in the Medicare Modernization Act, which in part creates a standard for CMS to employ credentialed coders in some capacity.

Just an idea or two.

Good luck.
 
Top