I'm having trouble with Modifiers 51 and 59. Doctor did and colonoscopy 45378 and EGD 43235 during the same session. I've used the 59 modifier on the EGD to show separate procedure. An insurance company indicated the modifier should have been 51. Please help. Thanks
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki Colon/EGD Modifier
- Thread starter cboston
- Start date
lovetocode
Guest
- Messages
- 109
- Best answers
- 0
Modifier 59 (Distinct Procedural Service) is only used when no other modifier better describes the situation. According to Appendix A in the CPT book on page 530 "...when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. Only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used."
Lisa Bledsoe
True Blue
Modifier -59 is the correct modifier in this case. You shouldn't need one at all, but often payors want one. I'd appeal. Argue that the procedures are technically different sites (one enters through the mouth, one enters through the rectum)...sometimes they need that pointed out to them.
Mod 59 vs 51
Modifier 59 is really not needed in this case. Check your CCI edits and you'll not find 45378 and 43235 paired in any way so a modifier is not required. I bill these two procedures together without and get paid just fine. Medicare automatically adds a mod 51 but you may need to append it with other insurances to show you performed more than one procedure at that same session by the same provider.
Modifier 59 is really not needed in this case. Check your CCI edits and you'll not find 45378 and 43235 paired in any way so a modifier is not required. I bill these two procedures together without and get paid just fine. Medicare automatically adds a mod 51 but you may need to append it with other insurances to show you performed more than one procedure at that same session by the same provider.
mitchellde
True Blue
You do not need modifier 59 because this modifier is used when you need to make a procedure distinc and separate from the other procedure performed in the same session, in other words to keep it from being considered bundled together. You do not need to make this distinction for this pair as it is inherent in their description that they are two disctinct and separate procedures...... you cannot ever examine the esophagus via a colonoscopic approach. Therefor there is not ever going to be an issure of bumndleing. The 51 modifier is correct as it indicates that both procedures were performed in the same session
coachlang3
True Blue
I agree with the lot of you, you don't need the 59 here, but I've seen a payor using their own edits. UHC is not paying for a colon/egd, unless you use a 59 mod, at least with the practice I'm at. My Supe went online and found out they do use the McKesson edits but can also add their own if they want to and it looks like they have.
Lisa Bledsoe
True Blue
Like I said, you shouldn't need one but many payors want one or they won't pay for both.