• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Content Based Coding vs Time Coding

K

KMilsap

Contributor
Messages
17
Location
Hammond, NY
:confused:Looking for some insight here! Coding Medication Management visits for BH using E/M levels. Our providers typically document the time spent with the patient. Some providers I have document a TON, so I feel comfortable giving them a Level 4 when they document that they were with the patient for 30 minutes. Other providers, however, only give me a few sentences but then document they spent 30 minutes with the patient. In this instance, I don't feel comfortable giving them a Level 4, since there is very little to back it up, and end up giving them a Level 3. Has anyone else ran into this? Should I just be giving them the Level 4 since they did indeed spend that much time with the patient? It makes me nervous to do so!
 
Are they documenting the time spent on medical counseling/coordination of care and does this meet the criteria stipulated in the guidelines of at least 50% of the time in the visit and documented as such? This does not include anything that might be psychotherapy in which case you would code the E/M based on normal history, exam and MDM scoring with an add-on code for the psychotherapy time. It is not recommended to use the counseling/coordination of care for behavioral health services given the difficulty in interpreting "counseling" and the option of the therapy add-on codes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top