• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Conversion of resurfacing arthroplasty to total arthroplasty

adunlap23

Guru
Messages
179
Location
Centre Hall, PA
Best answers
0
Hello everyone,

I could use some advice on how to code this procedure.

The patient had a previous shoulder resurfacing procedure performed, where only the damaged portion of the humeral head was replaced with a metal cap. The patient is now undergoing conversion to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

The surgeon describes the case as a “revision of a resurfacing hemiarthroplasty to a reverse total arthroplasty.”

My question is:
Would this be considered a revision arthroplasty (since a prosthetic cap is being removed and replaced), or should it be coded as a primary total shoulder arthroplasty (23472) because the previous implant did not include a ball and stem?

Thank you in advance for your input!
 
AAOS has looked at this. There are three ways you can -legitimately- code this. This could be coded as 23472+22 OR 23474-52 in a Medicare/Medicaid patient and could be coded 23472, 23334-59 in a commercial payor. The latter code pair is the best from a reimbursement standpoint and also most closely describes the procedure being done but comes up against an NCCI edit - still it is the most appropriate way of coding.
 
AAOS has looked at this. There are three ways you can -legitimately- code this. This could be coded as 23472+22 OR 23474-52 in a Medicare/Medicaid patient and could be coded 23472, 23334-59 in a commercial payor. The latter code pair is the best from a reimbursement standpoint and also most closely describes the procedure being done but comes up against an NCCI edit - still it is the most appropriate way of coding.
This is great information. Thank you for your help!
 
Top