• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Denial for 99204 New vs Established

Carenlom

New
Messages
1
Location
Huber Heights, OH
Best answers
0
We have received a denial for E/M code 99204 from a managed care plan stating that the patient was an established patient based on a Diagnostic Assessment 90791, 90785 we did about 10 days prior to the E/M.

My provider wants me to appeal based on the clip from the CMS guide to billing E/M: New Patient: An individual who did not receive any professional services from the physician/non-physician practitioner (NPP) or another physician of the same specialty who belongs to the same group practice within the previous 3 years.

We are a mental health organization and he states that since our providers are not "physicians" then they cannot use the diagnostic assessment as a previously professional services. I have argued that the diagnostic assessment was an encounter and therefore makes this patient established. How can I appeal something that I think is incorrect.

Am I wrong in this matter and should I still appeal?
 
Who billed for the 90791, 90785? If its same provider billing for the E&M its established. If its a different provider and different specialty then E&M would be new patient
 
Who billed for the 90791, 90785? If its same provider billing for the E&M its established. If its a different provider and different specialty then E&M would be new patient

Agreed, if the patient was seen by the same provider who did 90791/90785, and within 3 years, then the E/M visit is an Established Visit. Same if the provider is from that provider's department/specialty.
If the provider was different than the provider who performed 90791/90785, and haven't seen the patient before (or after 3 years), or from a different department/specialty, then the visit could be New Patient.

Noridian (my local MAC):

New Patient
Individual who has not received any professional services, Evaluation and Management (E/M) service or other face-to-face service (e.g., surgical procedure) from the same physician or physician group practice (same physician specialty and subspecialty) within the previous 3 years.

Established Patient
Individual who has received any professional services, E/M service or other face-to-face service (e.g., surgical procedure) from this provider or another provider (same specialty or subspecialty) in the same group practice within the previous three years.


Whether the provider is a physician or not, does not matter in terms of determining New vs. Established patient status. Any Face-to-Face encounters count towards the above criteria.


Hope that helps!
 
Last edited:
Top