• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Dictation question

Messages
178
Best answers
0
Is it unethical for us to ask the doctor not to sign off on his dictation until we, the coders, have read it? Sometimes they miss an important word or phrase that makes the difference on whether we can bill for something. We usually just bring it to his attention and he fixes it and then signs off. Some of our doctors are afraid of addendums, they are afraid they may be viewed as doing something fraudlent if they correct things after the report has been signed off. I don't agree with this as the things they correct are not used to upcharge or unbundle or anything like that....the changes are to clarify the dictation.

Thoughts?!?!?!?

Thanks,
Sue
 
Is it unethical for us to ask the doctor not to sign off on his dictation until we, the coders, have read it? Sometimes they miss an important word or phrase that makes the difference on whether we can bill for something. We usually just bring it to his attention and he fixes it and then signs off. Some of our doctors are afraid of addendums, they are afraid they may be viewed as doing something fraudlent if they correct things after the report has been signed off. I don't agree with this as the things they correct are not used to upcharge or unbundle or anything like that....the changes are to clarify the dictation.

Thoughts?!?!?!?

Thanks,
Sue

It isn't fraudulent if they repair, addend etc before the bill is generated, and even after, if the claim is also corrected.

HTH :)
 
Top