• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki E/M coding with procedures

Messages
9
Location
Tucson, AZ
Best answers
0
I was wondering if anyone codes an E/M rather than an injection. The RVU for E/M is higher in some cases than the injection RVU and I can't always justify an additional E/M using the 25 modifier.
 
I don't think that anyone has a choice in the matter - you can only code the service(s) that the documentation supports. E/M services and injections are two different things. If the documentation is for an injection, it can't be coded as an E/M simple to get a higher RVU.
 
Right because the E&M Isn't significant and separately identifiable. There is a minor E&M component built into all surgical procedures. You don't just blindly stick and run. You must use the code that most accurately describes the procedure and that is the injection. Using E&M in its place would be upcoding, which is considered an abusive if not fraudulent billing procedure (since you know better)
 
Last edited:
Top