• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki E/P Studies

ksschroeder

Networker
Messages
51
Location
Plankinton, SD
Best answers
0
I am hoping someone might be able to answer a question on how to bill correctly for E/P evals (93619 & 93620). We know that these 2 codes are for comprehensive studies. Our question is if it is more appropriate to bill these with the -52 modifier if only 2 of the 3 (HIS, RA, RV) are documented; or if we should should bill the individual codes (93600 - 93618) with the knowledge that 93621 can only be billed with 93620. We have heard arguments both ways and are having a hard time finding reputable sources for clarification.

Thank you for any help you can provide.
 
Hello,
I am hoping someone might be able to answer a question on how to bill correctly for E/P evals (93619 & 93620). We know that these 2 codes are for comprehensive studies. Our question is if it is more appropriate to bill these with the -52 modifier if only 2 of the 3 (HIS, RA, RV) are documented; or if we should should bill the individual codes (93600 - 93618) with the knowledge that 93621 can only be billed with 93620. We have heard arguments both ways and are having a hard time finding reputable sources for clarification.

You would not use modifier 52 on 93619-93620. If only 2 of the 3 (HIS, RA or RV) is documented then bill the individual codes (93600-93618). The CPT provides a definition of arrhthmia induction and gives a brief explanation on how to use these codes.

Hope this has been helpful,
Dolores, CPC - CCC
 
Top