• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Echocardiogram 93306 vs 93307. :confused:

jonyleo20

Guest
Messages
15
Best answers
0
:confused: I have a lot of reports just like the following and I am all confuse deciding which code to use . Please help ?

Is it 93306 or 93307 ?


** FINAL REPORT **
__________________


FINDINGS
--------
Study quality -
This was a technically difficult study with suboptimal views.
Study performed with the patient on the supine position.
Left Ventricle -
The left ventricle is moderately dilated. LVEDd- 6.4cm.
Overall left ventricular systolic function is severely reduced with
an EF of 25%.
Suboptimal diastology assessment.
Left Atrium -
The left atrium is mildly dilated.
LA diameter- 4.1 cm.
The left atrium was not well visualized.
Right Ventricle -
The right ventricle was not well visualized but systolic function
appears mildly reduced.
Right Atrium -
The right atrium was not well visualized.
Mitral Valve -
Mild mitral annular calcification present.
There is moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (3+).
Aortic Valve -
There is mild aortic regurgitation (1+).
The aortic valve appears moderately thickened consistent with
moderate aortic sclerosis. Valve excursion is reduced. There is at
least moderate aortic stenosis (low flow-low gradient) with peak/mean
gradients of 34/18mmHg. Limited views preclude an accurate estimation
of AVA.
Tricuspid Valve -
The tricuspid valve appears structurally normal.
There is mild tricuspid regurgitation.
Suboptimal spectral tracing precludes accurate estimation of RVSP.
Aorta -
Normal aortic root diameter.
The proximal ascending aorta was not well visualized.
IVC/Hepatic Veins -
The IVC was not visualized.
Pericardium -
There is no pericardial effusion.

CONCLUSIONS
-----------
1. This was a technically difficult study with suboptimal views.
2. Study performed with the patient on the supine position.
3. The left ventricle is moderately dilated. LVEDd- 6.4cm.
4. Overall left ventricular systolic function is severely reduced
with an EF of 25%.
5. There is moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (3+).
6. There is mild aortic regurgitation (1+).
7. There is at least moderate aortic stenosis (low flow-low gradient)
with peak/mean gradients of 34/18mmHg.
8. There is no pericardial effusion.
 
93306 vs 93307

The spectral tracing would be included in the 93306(not the 93307) but the report should include the dopper measurements. I code for an IDTF & we rarely bill the 93307. A complete echo, with correct documentation should be 93306.
 
echo 93306 vs 93307

Thank you jcarney12.

I was wondering the wording / key words that will tell me if this is a 93306 or a 93307. What I this is that if Spectral Doppler and Color flow were used Dr should have mention it on the report right ? or is there any word on this report that tells me that spectral Doppler and color flow is used ????

For me looks like a Complete ECHO 93307 without spectral Doppler and without Color Flow .

PLease advice
 
Top