• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Endoscopy and Bravo tube placement

NESmith

Guest
Messages
309
Location
Zephyrhills, FL
Best answers
0
For this procedure we billed a 43235-59 and 91035. The insurance company is denying the 43235 as inclusive even with the 59 modifier. The op-report reads: The Olympus video endoscope was advanced to the descending duodenum. Endoscopic Findings: Descending duodenum is normal. Duodenal bulb is normal. Pylorus is normal. Antrum is normal. Body is normal. Fundus is normal. There is some retained gastric content noted. Pt has a hiatal henria. At 31 cm, a Bravo ph probe was placed without difficulty. The remainder of the esophagus is normal. Was this denied correctly? Thanks
 
Top