• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
  • Important Note: We will be performing a scheduled maintenance on 1st November 2020. The site will be offline from 7:30PM (MT) till midnight. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Failed upgrade to Bi-V from AICD

Bentonville, AR
Best answers
I am struggling with this procedure. It was a failed procedure but modifier 53 and 52 are not allowed to be billed with the 33224. I have copied the procedure note below...any advice would be appreciatated.

Thank you

Kim Floyd, CPC

The patient has congestive heart failure, class III with
dilated cardiomyopathy of less than 25% with QRS above 130. Risks,
benefits, alternatives, gross possible complications, need for team
approach were discussed with the patient and her daughters, and
informed consent was obtained.

A 6-cm incision was made into the left pectoral area with blunt and
sharp dissection. I freed the AICD leads as well as the
defibrillator. I accessed the left axillary vein and advanced
initially a CPS 35 cm then used a CPS wide, then CPS straight through
the procedure, and we tried to advance a QuickFlex 1258T/86 cm micro
into the coronary sinus. the angiography of the coronary sinus in
multiple views showed only 1 very large suitable lateral vein that
was very tortuous. I was not able to stabilize the lead in a
suitable location. After more than 60 minutes of fluoro time, I
decided to stop. The defibrillator was placed back into the pocket,
and the incision closed with 2-0 Vicryl x3 layers and skin staples.

PLAN We will consult CT surgery for possible epicardial lead and
upgrade to Bi-V.
Bentonville, AR
Best answers
Figured it out and in case anyone wants to know...in this example the venogram would be charged since the 52 and 53 aren't allowed with 33224