• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Hi! I have a question about when to separately report a test during E/M

Hunter16

Guest
Messages
1
Best answers
0
Hello fellow coders,

I am currently a CPC-A and working on Practicode. When billing an E/M code along with EKG report, I get confused sometimes when reading through the clinical record. I don't always know when I should separately report say, code 93010 for an EKG, just as an example. I am wondering what keys words will help me decide when to separately report this. For example, in the record, if the doctor writes: "Results [of the test] were independently viewed by me and interpreted by the radiologist and contemporaneously by me." Is it the use of the word "independently" or "contemporaneously" or something else I should be looking at that hints at a test being separately reportable?

Thank you for any assistance!

Ryan
 
Whoever did the formal, and separate, interpretation and report of the test is who bills for it. In your example, "Results [of the test] were independently viewed by me and interpreted by the radiologist and contemporaneously by me.", the radiologist did the interpretation and report. The provider simply took a look at it, so there was no formal interpretation and no separate report from that interpretation. If there are tests performed, the interpretation and results should be separately documented.
 
Top