• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

History of cancer guidelines

lillianivy

Networker
Messages
59
Location
Livingston, LA
I know the coding guidelines state that a pt is considered History of Cancer once they are no longer receiving treatment and there is no evidence of disease. A pt with colon cancer will keep their port in for 2 years after treatment is completed in case there is a recurrence. To a physician the pt is not considered History of until at least 5-10 years out with no recurrence. So this is where the coding and the clinical world clashes. Do we code by what the doctor wants? Not History of until they say? Or do we code strictly by our guidelines and make it history of since the scans show no evidence of disease and pt no longer receiving treatment. The problem is that with the EMR system we use it pulls the codes with description on the pt's office note and the doctors do not like seeing the History of on it, because they feel the pt is not considered history of. Plus they are worried if this would affect the way they treat them because they are to follow certain guidelines about how often they see the pt and have them retested. I need clarification and others insight on this.

Thank you,
Lydia
 
Even though the scans might show no evidence of disease, they arent a dx. If the physician does not consider the patient to be disease-free and continues to document the disease as current, then I would code the disease as current. If the patient has the port in, then that port has to be checked, flushed, and replaced if issues arise, so they are still under surveillance/care/treatment in sequeala of that disease. Just as if a patient wasnt taking chemo/rad treatment but still had a rx for maintenance; they woudnt be taking the maintenance or wearing the port if the disease was not still in some way being treated, and thus, current. I would also consider this: the physician might not like seeing "hx of" in the patient's chart because if the patient sees that chart, sees the "hx of", they might think they are "cured" and behave differently or AMA, especially if the physician is telling the patient the disease is still current.
 
Last edited:
Top