Petlorilea
Contributor
I have coders who are overflagging providers 'after the fact'. I posted an example on another thread and got great feedback, but I have another. And its RAMPANT. The problem is the coders want to have the providers amend the chart to include all things assessed in the HPI (not the other way around...I agree what you present for is what should be assessed).
Patient presents with headaches and hypertension. In the assessment, those diagnoses are documented, but there is also mention of urinary frequency. Provider writes rx. Patients do this a lot (I've even done it to my dr), but many of the staff want the HPI to be amended to match the A/P, even if it reads 'since you're writing a script for my BP, that reminds me that I'm also out of insulin', or 'does this mole look odd to you?'
I keep trying to tell them that this has the potential for overcoding, and I'm pretty much getting laughed out of the facility.
I promise I won't ask again! Thanks
Patient presents with headaches and hypertension. In the assessment, those diagnoses are documented, but there is also mention of urinary frequency. Provider writes rx. Patients do this a lot (I've even done it to my dr), but many of the staff want the HPI to be amended to match the A/P, even if it reads 'since you're writing a script for my BP, that reminds me that I'm also out of insulin', or 'does this mole look odd to you?'
I keep trying to tell them that this has the potential for overcoding, and I'm pretty much getting laughed out of the facility.
I promise I won't ask again! Thanks