• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Hyperlipidemia

kumeena

True Blue
Messages
610
Location
Bellerose, NY
Best answers
0
If doctor documented and coded for HL (272.4) and (272.1) is it OK to bill like that?

Thank you
 
272.1 is hyperglyceridemia, I looked it up and posted the definition below. If he documeted HL which is hyperlipidemia abbreviated, I would feel comfortable using 272.4 = unspecified hyperlipidema, but I would not use 272.1 without verifying with the doctor that this is actually what the patient has.

hyperglyceridemia
[-glī′səridē′mē·ə]
Etymology: Gk, hyper, glykys + haima, blood
an excess of glycerides, particularly triglycerides, in the blood. It is caused by a congenital defect in the ability to metabolize the amino acid glycine.
Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition. © 2009, Elsevier.
 
272.4 definition indicates elevated cholesterol and triglycerides. I would use this code only for HL. If provider states hypertriglyceridemia, then use 272.1. You could use both if you have that statement, otherwise 272.4 is good enough :)
 
Top