GregPalmer
Guest
- Messages
- 12
- Best answers
- 0
Some of the people I work with think that the evolution of the EMR will decrease the need for medical coders, resulting in fewer medical coders being employed. We know of course that one can't depend on a computer to come up with a correct code, and auditing is necessary. The other view is that even though human auditing is required, the EMRs will do some of the work, so there will be a net decrease in the number of human coders required.
I'm wondering whether anyone has objective data to support either view? Or alternatively, is there a third party out there somewhere who has an unbiased view? (e.g. when I want to know who's likely to win a football game, I don't ask a fan, I look at the betting line in Las Vegas: see what people who are betting their own money have to say.)
I'm wondering whether anyone has objective data to support either view? Or alternatively, is there a third party out there somewhere who has an unbiased view? (e.g. when I want to know who's likely to win a football game, I don't ask a fan, I look at the betting line in Las Vegas: see what people who are betting their own money have to say.)