• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Is grossly normal acceptable?

ksiegler

New
Messages
6
Best answers
0
Using 1997 guidelines, is "grossly normal" acceptable for all elements for all bullets for that particular area/system?
 
Using 1997 guidelines, is "grossly normal" acceptable for all elements for all bullets for that particular area/system?

If they refer to specific anatomy listed in a bullet, then I'd said yes, but if it's a blanket statement, I wouldn't count it. I run into 'Normocephalic' and 'Within normal limits' frequently. 'Normocephalic' is too vague for me to assign a bullet, but I'll count the latter if it's in reference to something direct. You only need to show that they examined the criteria of the bullet to count it; not that they found a specific problem with it. I don't think it's necessary to document the bullets word-for-word, to accomplish that.

Hope that helps! ;)
 
Top