Question Level 2 or 3?

ksrodgers

Contributor
Messages
12
Location
Newmarket, NH
Best answers
0
I'm having an impossible time leveling this visit.

A patient comes in to request discussion for vasectomy at a PCP visit. The PCP puts in a referral for vasectomy.
That is all the note states. The provider does not do an evaluation or give a summary of his discussion (if he had one) with the patient. Only states "Referral to urology sent."

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
I'm having an impossible time leveling this visit.

A patient comes in to request discussion for vasectomy at a PCP visit. The PCP puts in a referral for vasectomy.
That is all the note states. The provider does not do an evaluation or give a summary of his discussion (if he had one) with the patient. Only states "Referral to urology sent."

Thoughts?

Is the note complete enough to code an E/M visit at all?
 
We would have to see the whole (redacted) note to know. Why did they even come in at all, they have an HMO and have to get a referral?
 
We would have to see the whole (redacted) note to know. Why did they even come in at all, they have an HMO and have to get a referral?
please check the patient is established patient to the PCP and any related condition identified earlier, if yes will code 99212
 
please check the patient is established patient to the PCP and any related condition identified earlier, if yes will code 99212
Respectfully disagree. We can't know what the E/M is, if there even is one, without seeing documentation. Was this patient even seen or did they come in and just pick up a form or an electronic referral was put in? Could this be possibly a level 2? Probably, however, without seeing the documentation fully, it can't be coded. This seems to be a family planning type visit. There is a possibility of coding it by time if time was documented properly. Especially if it was more a discussion face to face. It "might" be a 99212 if the patient was established. I would imagine there was more to the note if the patient was seen face to face by the provider. Especially if the practice has an EMR/EHR, like chief complaint/reason for visit, history, ROS, anything else? Even if the provider would have said, We discussed the procedure, he is low risk, he takes no meds, or takes X, Y, Z meds, listing any conditions he may have, I referred him to urology. This is probably a documentation improvement scenario to talk with the doc about.
 
Top