• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Manual Cystolitholapaxy

Create Wiki
K

KaylaRieken

True Blue
Messages
525
Location
Waukee, IA
Best answers
0
Op Report goes like this:

Cystoscopy was carried out. At this timeframe , the stent exiting the right ureteral orifice had severe encrustation encompassing the entire curl of the distal right ureteral stent. At this timeframe, the short jaw grasper was then used to manually crush and remove the stones from the distal curl. After the this timeframe, the stent was able to be grasped and removed intact.

Is this ok to charge 52317 even though an instrument wasn't used to generate shockwaves to break up the stones?
 
Per the definition of CPT 52317: "Litholapaxy: crushing or fragmentation of calculus by any means..."

The use of a grasper to manually crush the stone is still considered litholapaxy.

You may also want to look at billing 52318 in this case, as the stones being encrusted on the stent makes it "complicated" for the purpose of coding.

Sincerely,

Drew Vinson
CPC
NW Urology
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top