• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki MDM must be one of the 2 elements

Create Wiki
S

solocoder

Expert
Messages
457
Location
springfield, MO
Best answers
0
Our health system has recently created a new policy that says we must use MDM as one of the 2 elements considered in LOS for established patients. Soooo... that means that even when the doctor has recommended surgery to a patient he has been treating conservatively for a while, without much success, he can almost never get above a 99212? The one established, stable condition will bring them down to a 2 every time, no matter how good their history and exam are. Data points won't help. For elective surgeries they rarely review more than an xray or an MRI.
Am I looking at this right??
Or does the fact that they are recommending surgery mean the condition is not considered "stable"?
Any thoughts?
 
I think you make a very good point and I struggle with this too. The practice of requiring MDM to meet a level is becoming common, but in my opinion it's not a good policy for precisely the reason you describe, and because it also directly contradicts CPT. There are cases where a high level of history and exam are warranted and medically necessary but where MDM might not be as high - a provider may need to go through an extensive history and exam just to be able to say the patient is fine. I find that such a policy works best for highest level codes, but often breaks down as you move down toward lower codes. If you find the policy is requiring you to unfairly down-code provider claims, I'd recommend you take examples to your supervisors or managers and work with them to try to improve it.
 
solocoder said:
Our health system has recently created a new policy that says we must use MDM as one of the 2 elements considered in LOS for established patients. Soooo... that means that even when the doctor has recommended surgery to a patient he has been treating conservatively for a while, without much success, he can almost never get above a 99212? The one established, stable condition will bring them down to a 2 every time, no matter how good their history and exam are. Data points won't help. For elective surgeries they rarely review more than an xray or an MRI.
Am I looking at this right??
Or does the fact that they are recommending surgery mean the condition is not considered "stable"?
Any thoughts?
Click to expand...

I think you have answered your own question within your question - if "the doctor has recommended surgery to a patient he has been treating conservatively for a while, without much success" than that would be 2 points! The condition is not stable, otherwise he would not be taking him to surgery. Risk would be moderate to high, depending on the surgery and any co-morbidities. In that case your MDM could at least be low for at least a 99213.

I agree that making the MDM as one of the 2 elements is harsh. I worked for a company that used that theory too and I always felt it was inappropriately down coding. I feel this way of thinking is confusing "medical decision making" with "medical necessity" which are two different things and causes a lot of down coding of E/M charges. Actually, in the past I have had a couple charts randomly audited by a Medicare MAC - both coded as 99214 because the MDM was moderate - and both were corrected by the MAC to 99215 based on the comprehensive history and exam, even with the moderate MDM!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top