• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki MEAT requirements with new E&M changes

lcourt6

Guest
Messages
18
Location
Rutland, MA
Best answers
0
Hi all!! I have a question related to Risk Coding and the new E&M changes.

I have a doctor in my organzation that is stating that the MEAT requirements are not needed for every condition now because of the new documentation requirements for E&Ms. Is this true? I have been reading a lot on this, and I haven't found anything that states this is not required for ICD10 use and RA coding.
 
Did the physician provide a reason for this opinion and the source of his conclusion? That may clarify some of the points as you understand the requirement and his opinion? Also, did you continue to research the issue, and do you still maintain that his position is not supported?
 
Hi all!! I have a question related to Risk Coding and the new E&M changes.

I have a doctor in my organzation that is stating that the MEAT requirements are not needed for every condition now because of the new documentation requirements for E&Ms. Is this true? I have been reading a lot on this, and I haven't found anything that states this is not required for ICD10 use and RA coding.
Like SKWashington I would also like to see your physician's argument reference basis. However, MEAT and E&M guidelines are not the same. They may overlap a little or even look similar, but we as HCC coders do not pick up codes based on E&M rules and guidelines. Unless there is a Coding Clinic or another AMA guideline I haven't seen that suggests otherwise, I would be concerned with following that physician's comment.
 
Top