When billing for clinical test interpretations one of the Medicare coverage criteria is the pathologist must exercise medical judgment, and it must express a medical opinion or conclusion. I know the pathologist can't simply say "agree with tech" or "elevated [such and such]" per Dennis Padget. But what if the pathologist interpretation is "all results fall within normal limits" or "electrophorsis of the concentrated urinary protein shows albumin and other fractions present in their usual proportion". Does this meet Medicare's coverage criteria?