Wiki mod 26

The situation is the hospital will soon own the physician office and believes that modifier 26 should be attached to the E/M code to signify that we are providing the professional component in their facility. I can't find any literature anywhere that disputes or supports this.
 
E/M codes have a payment status indicator of zero (0)

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/pfslookup/02_PFSsearch.asp

0=Professional Component/Technical Component Indicator (PC/TC)

0 Physician service codes: This indicator identifies codes that describe physician services. Examples include visits, consultations, and surgical procedures. The concept of PC/TC does not apply since physician services cannot be split into professional and technical components. Modifiers 26 and TC cannot be used with these codes. The total RVUs include values for physician work, practice expense and malpractice expense. There are some codes with no work RVUs.

http://medicare.fcso.com/Fee_resources/137945.pdf
 
Top