• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Modifier 52 and wart destruction

Create Wiki
P

phycoder

Networker
Messages
33
Location
Bentonville, AR
Best answers
0
I just started working at a new place and they are coding 17000-52 for 3 warts, reportedly for treating an area (same wart) an additional time (separate encounter). Cryotherapy was used. Any opinions?
 
A wart is not a premalignant lesion so the code is incorrect. Per AMA guidelines (For destruction of common or plantar warts, see 17110, 17111)

17110 would be appropriate for 1-14 warts. Considering this code is up to 14 warts it more than enough covers the additional work.
 
CodingKing said:
A wart is not a premalignant lesion so the code is incorrect. Per AMA guidelines (For destruction of common or plantar warts, see 17110, 17111)

17110 would be appropriate for 1-14 warts. Considering this code is up to 14 warts it more than enough covers the additional work.
Click to expand...



Thank you. That's what I thought. I also don't think they should use the -52 modifier. It's not a reduced service. Thoughts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top