• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki New patient dermatology skin check no hpi (help!)

Messages
9
Location
Kapolei, HI
Best answers
0
I cannot get an HPI for the life of me. Can family history of melanoma be counted as context for the below information gathered?

Chief Complaint: Mole Check

HPI: This is a 15 year old male who has a family history of melanoma, and is here for mole check. Pertinent negatives include: no previous history of skin cancer.

ROS and PFSH recorded. Patient had a detailed exam along with biopsies of 2 lesions examined on left arm and assessment of dysplastic nevus to right upper back with counseling and solar lentigines with counseling. I can get 2 of 3 from this visit but I know I need 3 of 3 for new patient.

Can family history be counted as context? Otherwise, can this be down coded to an established to meet at least the 2 of 3 for an established patient.

Any information will be appreciated. I have searched everywhere for answers.:(
 
I am new at this, so a more experienced coder should also chime in.

You cannot convert a new patient to an established patient.

It appears to me you should code 99202, since his HPI contains one (CC) component.
 
I would agree that you can't change this to an established patient, and would also agree with counting the HPI as one element (since all we know is that it is a 'mole') - No matter how you try to count this, you could only justify a 'brief' HPI. Family history is part of PFSH not context for HPI.

I'd also mention though that since a minor procedure was performed at this visit (biopsy), the evaluation for that problem is considered part of the procedure and can't be separately coded. You would need enough separately identifiable E&M to support a modifier 25, and without additional HPI, I don't think you have that and can't support billing an E&M code.
 
"procedure only" does not meet new patient requirements

Thank you. I was thinking this would be a "procedure only" as I didn't think I could get anything from HPI as family history would be considered part of PFSH. At most I was thinking context as that is how patient can have a malignant mole due to being a hereditary condition. I do not see this meeting new patient requirements and down coding this to procedure only.
 
Top