• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

new problem

AmandaW

AmandaW

Guru
Messages
249
Location
Jacksonville, AR
In the ER, would every presenting diagnosis at least be 3 points?
What if it is a "minor or self-limiting" problem but new problem to the Dr?
 
Thank you for your reply. Maybe I'm overthinking it, but why not 3 or 4 depending on workup or no workup in the 'Number of diagnoses or treatment options' for 'New problem to examiner'?
 
This is the same question I am having from a physician in my practice. What is the true definition of a NEW problem.

If patient comes in new to clinic and is complaining of a UTI and doctor prescribes medication and review urine results. How does this qualify for a self-limited decision making?
 
MDM is composed of three parts: problem points ("number of diagnosis or management options"), data points ("amount and/or complexity of data to be reviewed"), and risk level ("risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality"). You only need two of these to get your level. So you can get a high level without high problem points if you've got enough data points and risk.
 
Last edited:
Hello,

I code & bill for physicians who bill professional but see pts in hospital.

I too was confused about this, as my providers could see the pts several times a year under several different admissions. I asked an auditor who was giving an E/M presentation at aapc chapter meeting.

She stated that at every new admit the problems would be considered new to provider even if they had treated that problem under a previous admission.

Not 100% if this would apply to ER but thought I would share.
 
Thank you Midnightsun!

CatchTheWind, Right. Those are the problem points. And you only need two out of the three to get your MDM. Sometimes the Amount and/or Complexity of data reviewed is not very high-sometimes can only get 2 points from there so I have to look at the other two routes when looking into if I can bill a moderate level.
That's where my question came into play. 1 point verses 3 is a major difference. A 'self-limiting' or 'minor' problem CAN be a 'New' problem to examiner. So my question was which way is correct to look at it?

Self-limiting/minor problem - 1 point......OR.......
New problem to examiner - 3 points

???
 
nomerz, have you ever been audited? If so, it came out ok?

I'm new to ER but I've been doing hospitalists coding for awhile now. In hospitalists coding I didn't have to worry about that so much as they usually have numerous issues going on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top