• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Question New VS Established claim correction

Messages
8
Location
St George, UT
Best answers
0
Hello ,
Looking for guidance on an E/M coding issue.

A provider recently opened a new Pain Management practice, and many patients followed him from his previous clinic. He billed them as new patients because he believed a new TIN allowed this. The claims were denied, and I was asked to simply change the codes from new to established while keeping the same level (e.g., 99204 to 99214).

My understanding is that this is not a direct conversion. New and established patient E/M codes have different requirements, so the documentation should be reviewed and the established patient code selected based on the applicable MDM. The provider does not bill based on time.

Am I correct that the notes should be re-reviewed and recoded rather than automatically changing 99204 to 99214? Has anyone dealt with a similar situation?
 
Hello ,
Looking for guidance on an E/M coding issue.

A provider recently opened a new Pain Management practice, and many patients followed him from his previous clinic. He billed them as new patients because he believed a new TIN allowed this. The claims were denied, and I was asked to simply change the codes from new to established while keeping the same level (e.g., 99204 to 99214).

My understanding is that this is not a direct conversion. New and established patient E/M codes have different requirements, so the documentation should be reviewed and the established patient code selected based on the applicable MDM. The provider does not bill based on time.

Am I correct that the notes should be re-reviewed and recoded rather than automatically changing 99204 to 99214? Has anyone dealt with a similar situation?

New and established have the same MDM criteria under the new E/M guidelines. The AMA MDM table shows them in the same line as well: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-06/cpt-revised-mdm-grid.pdf

If you're leveling based on time, you may be shortchanging the provider. A 99204 is 45–59 minutes, while established patient codes are 99214 for 30–39 minutes and 99215 for 40 minutes or more.

Under the old 1995/1997 guidelines, there were differences in the number of key components required for new versus established patient visits. Once the 2021 office/outpatient E/M changes took effect and MDM was simplified, I happily put all of that out of my head!
 
Top