• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Office visit Procedure for Endometrial Adhesion

dmarshall

Networker
Messages
49
Location
Tulsa, OK
Best answers
0
Hi Group,

Need assistance again please:


Attempt was made to break endometrial adhesion via ultrasound guidance. A speculum was placed and Single tooth tenaculum was used to manipulate uterus. Ultrasound was being used abdominally for guidance. Multiple attempts made to pass into endometrium which was unsuccessful. Instruments removed. Silver nitrate and monsels placed on cervix to obtain adequate hemostasis. This was unsuccessful so figure of 8 stitch with 0 vicryl was thrown which controlled bleeding. Patient tolerated well.

Code 58999 or included in E/M?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
New one for me!
IF the procedure had been completed, I would use unlisted and compare it to 58559 (hysteroscopy with lysis of intrauterine adhesions).
IF this had been done with a hysteroscope, I would bill 58559-53.
Since neither of those are the case here, I would bill unlisted and compare to 58559 with a reduction (like 70% of 58559 for example).
And also 76998 for ultrasound guidance.
That being said, assuming there is documentation to justify E/M, I wouldn't count someone wrong for billing E/M only. I just don't think it's the MOST accurate option.
 
New one for me!
IF the procedure had been completed, I would use unlisted and compare it to 58559 (hysteroscopy with lysis of intrauterine adhesions).
IF this had been done with a hysteroscope, I would bill 58559-53.
Since neither of those are the case here, I would bill unlisted and compare to 58559 with a reduction (like 70% of 58559 for example).
And also 76998 for ultrasound guidance.
That being said, assuming there is documentation to justify E/M, I wouldn't count someone wrong for billing E/M only. I just don't think it's the MOST accurate option.
 
Top