• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki post op

Create Wiki
K

krssy70

Guru
Messages
236
Location
East Providence, RI
Best answers
0
Can you bill for an office visit following surgery during a global period utilizing the modifier 24 modifier when the physician reviews the pathology report thoroughly and corresponds with the pathologist regarding the findings? This was a prolonged visit and only a very small part of the visit was related to post op follow up.

Thank you,
Kristen Richard, CPC
 
This article may be helpful to you; the author cites her official sources at the end of the article: http://www.facs.org/ahp/pubs/tips/tips0710.pdf

Also, I believe the OIG workplan includes scrutiny of billing for E/M visits during the global surgical period (modifier 24).

The E/M during a global surgical period must clearly document that the reason for the visit is significant and separate from the reason for the surgery. Even though your MD spent a lot of time related to reviewing the pathology report, it's still related to the surgery, so can't see how you could justify it being not related to the surgery. Ask yourself this: If I were sitting on the witness stand in front of CMS, OIG, and lawyers, what argument would I use to defend my use of a modifier 24 in this instance?

Hope this helps
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top