• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Questionable hernia repair

JenReyn99

Guru
Messages
142
Location
Redding, CA
Best answers
0
I know I'm probably overthinking again, but I wanted to get other opinions before I send this one off. The doc says it's an abdominal wall hernia repair, but to me, it doesn't seem like they really did much with the hernia itself. So here's the op note.

A vertical incision was then made. The laxity was identified, the skin is quite redundant and ther is obvious dissimilarity between the left and right side of the abdominal wall. In the portion which is external and lateral of the iliac spine, the colon was adherent and the adhesions are taken down. Seromuscular silk sutures were placed in the serosa of the colon after lysis of adhesion to ensure that there would be no possible bowel leakage. No enterotomy actually occurred, however, merely separation of the serosa where it was densely adherent to the mesh. There was no contamination of the field. The mesh was resutured to the anterior iliac area. Care taken to avoid regional nerves. Prolene sutures were utilized for this repair.

To me, it looks like they just lysed some adhesions, and then re-sutured the mesh. I know the lysis would be 44005, but I don't know what to code for the mesh resuture, or if that is considered a recurrent hernia repair, in which case the lysis would be included. Please help! Thanks!
 
Top