• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki RAC denial appeal letters

Create Wiki
L

lcoe0519

New
Messages
4
Location
Kearney, MO
Best answers
0
I have a couple of questions. I have been handling denials and writing appeal letters for about a year now. I was sort of thrown into this position. My first question is, can anyone offer me any kind of resources or webinars, online learning opportunities so that I can make better arguments and write better letters? I've done okay so far, but things are getting a little more intense for me and I want to make sure that I'm capable and educated.

My second questions is this, I am currently working on an appeal. The patient suffered a bowel perforation during a colonoscopy. The coder incorrectly assigned the code for a traumatic laceration to the colon as the principal diagnosis, DRG 329. The RAC auditor submitted a denial saying the principal diagnosis should have been K63.1, Perforation of intestine (nontraumatic). While I agree the that traumatic laceration was incorrect, I disagree with K63.1. I believe the correct principal diagnosis should be K91.71, Accidental puncture and laceration of a digestive system organ or structure during a digestive system procedure with K63.1 as a secondary diagnosis. We still lose money on reimbursement, but not as much. So can I write a letter arguing that K91.71 should be principal?
 
Hi
I think ins company is correct...K63.1 because that is what happen. I'd add a dx code K91.71 as 2nd dx code. and one of the T dx blocks. Does the med records state that an misadventure or error was made during the colonoscopy?Check to add the dx blocks of the T codes of T88 or T85 probably help if appropriate. As resources in doing appeals check NCCI, IOM, and CMS Medicare regarding these gastro procedures. Or quote a reference from online medical specialist website.
I hope this helps you.
Lady T
 
I may be way off base here, because this is completely NOT my area, but I thought non-traumatic meant pathological or ideopathic, such as a spontaneous rupture or rupture caused by disease. Wouldn't this be a traumatic laceration/puncture?
 
I think it is technically a traumatic laceration and certainly that is what the original coder was thinking, but I think the ins company feels traumatic meaning external trauma.
 
TThivierge said:
Hi
I think ins company is correct...K63.1 because that is what happen. I'd add a dx code K91.71 as 2nd dx code. and one of the T dx blocks. Does the med records state that an misadventure or error was made during the colonoscopy?Check to add the dx blocks of the T codes of T88 or T85 probably help if appropriate. As resources in doing appeals check NCCI, IOM, and CMS Medicare regarding these gastro procedures. Or quote a reference from online medical specialist website.
I hope this helps you.
Lady T
Click to expand...
Yes the chart says it happened during a colonoscopy which is why the patient was admitted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top