• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • We're introducing new features and a new look to make the forums easier to use and more valuable to you. See what's new and let us know what you think!

Reimbursement for interventional radilolgy

Messages
1
Best answers
0
What code do I use for a Radiologist that works for a hospital and assisted with the procedure 66490 Injection diagnostic or therapeutic agent paravertebral facet joint. He completed the image guidance part of the procedure. Image guidance is included in the procedure. what code can I use for the professional component of the procedure for the Radiologist?
 

thomas7331

True Blue
Messages
2,049
Best answers
0
What code do I use for a Radiologist that works for a hospital and assisted with the procedure 66490 Injection diagnostic or therapeutic agent paravertebral facet joint. He completed the image guidance part of the procedure. Image guidance is included in the procedure. what code can I use for the professional component of the procedure for the Radiologist?
I'm not sure if there's any official guidance on this sort of thing, but what I've done in this situation, if the medical necessity of both providers is documented in the record, has been to code the surgeon's work with the main code with a 52 modifier to show that that provider did not perform the full service, and then code the radiologist's work with the imaging guidance code with an XP modifier to show that this portion was performed by a different provider and specialty and is therefore not a bundled service. If there isn't a medically necessary reason documented for the second provider, though, then I'd think that this might be more appropriately billed just by the one provider with the other's work as a courtesy. That might be something to discuss with the providers.

I'd be interested to know if anyone else has any thoughts on this.
 
Top