• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki ROS Documentation

Create Wiki
O

OliviaPrice

Networker
Messages
92
Location
Shawnee, KS
Best answers
0
The 1995 documentation guidelines states the following:

(DG) At least ten organ systems must be reviewed. Those systems with positive or pertinent negative responses must be individually documented. For the remaining systems, a notation indicating all other systems are negative is permissible. In the absence of such a notation, at least ten systems must be
individually documented.

Would this statement be acceptable to bill for a complete ROS? "A 10 point review of systems was completed, all systems are negative except as noted above." Above is referring to the HPI.
 
what is in HPI?

I have to see what specifically is stated in the HPI - you stated "above is referring to HPI".

Are there pertinent positives & negatives stated in HPI that can be used as ROS without double dipping? Sometimes physicians combine it all together. If not, then I would agree no it would not qualify.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top