• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Simple question - I promise!

Love Coding!

Expert
Messages
371
Location
Tempe, AZ
Best answers
0
Under the 1995 examination guidelines my physician dictates:

Neck: Supple w/out lymphadenopathy.

Can I use this statement as either examining a body area "neck" or examining an organ system "lymphatic"?

I understand under the 97' guidelines you would need to examine 2+ areas under lymph.

Thank you,

GeminiCoder74 :)
 
You sure can!

The neck is recognized by both sets of guidelines as a body area. Per the 1995 guidelines, your physician's statement would qualify as 1 body area/system. Best wishes!
 
Under the 1995 examination guidelines my physician dictates:

Neck: Supple w/out lymphadenopathy.

Can I use this statement as either examining a body area "neck" or examining an organ system "lymphatic"?

I understand under the 97' guidelines you would need to examine 2+ areas under lymph.

Thank you,

GeminiCoder74 :)

I'm leaning towards Neck and organ system (Hematologic/lymphatic/immunologic)


If the physician had just documented: Neck: supple...I would only credit neck

If the physician had just documented: Neck: w/o lymphadenopathy...I would only credit Hematologic/lymphatic/immunologic.

BUT...Since he documented "Neck: Supple w/out lymphadenopathy", I vote for both.

IMHO...
 
Top