• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Stuck on a Trach Tube Change Procedure

BABS37

Guest
Messages
312
Location
Adel, IA
Best answers
0
I'm having trouble deciding which is the correct way to charge out this procedure. The patient has been coming in for over a year who is tracheotomy dependent. He comes in for a change and the physician decides to do a revision flap tracheotomy-which would lead me to 31830 series but he is also replacing the tube which would toss me back to 31614 series... i just don't know what to do as I haven't had any situations like this one. Thoughts on how to code this one?

Procedure:
Revision Flap Tracheotomy with Bronchoscopy and tracheotomy tube change

...a tracheotomy tube change was attempted. The #6 shiley trach tube was removed. A #7 tube was utilized and this was not possible. Therefore, a #6 was placed into the trachea through the tracheotomy site and was ventilated. At this point, I made the decision to go forward with a formal flap tracheotomy. The standard flap incisions were designed on the anterior neck. A dissection of the tracheotomy tract from the skin to the trachea was carefully carried out, with the excision of the entire scar band of the tracheotomy tract leaving a large open wound. The subcutaneous undermining of the skin flaps were performed circumferentially. Each flap was then carefully sewn to the trachea using 3-0 suture. A 4-0 suture was used to close the margins of the skin flaps. At this point, a #8 shiley tube was placed with no difficulty. A flexible bronchoscopy was performed evaluating the tracha and mainstream bronchi, and secondary bronchi, revealed no bleeding site of abnormality. At this stage, the procedure was termed.

Lost! :(
 
I would use the 31614. I am no expert but when reading the lay descriptions, it seems they are describing what you have in your note for the 31614. 31830 decribes just revising an old scar.
 
Top