• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Subacromial bursa debridement: 29826 or 29823?

kgrah71

New
Messages
2
Location
Littleton, CO
Best answers
0
I need an opinion. I don't feel that we can bill both 29823 and 29826 the way the documentation stands... I feel that the debridement of the subacromial bursa is included in 29826. My thought would be to bill 29827,23430 and 29823 with the 3 structures being the labrum, the glenoid and the subacromial bursa, my provider of course wants to bill ALL the codes. Would love some second looks!

29827
29826
23430
29823

OR

29827
29826
23430

OR

29827
29823
23430

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:

1. Left shoulder rotator cuff tear.

2. Left shoulder long head of biceps tendinitis.

3. Left shoulder superior labral tear.

4. Evaluate for left shoulder chondromalacia.

5. Left shoulder subacromial bursitis.

6. Left shoulder subacromial impingement.


POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:

1. Left shoulder rotator cuff tear.

2. Left shoulder long head of biceps tendinitis.

3. Left shoulder superior labral tear.

4. Left shoulder chondromalacia.

5. Left shoulder subacromial bursitis.

6. Left shoulder subacromial impingement.

PROCEDURES PERFORMED:

1. Left shoulder arthroscopy, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

2. Left shoulder arthroscopic extensive debridement, including debridement of superior labrum, chondral tissue, and subacromial bursa.

3. Left shoulder arthroscopic subacromial decompression/acromioplasty.

4. Left shoulder open subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: The patient sustained injury to his left shoulder resulting in a full-thickness rotator cuff tear of the supraspinatus tendon. Additional pathology has been identified as detailed above. The patient has been indicated for left shoulder arthroscopy with rotator cuff repair, debridement, subacromial decompression, and possible open biceps tenodesis. The risks and benefits of the procedure have been explained to the patient in detail, and informed consent was obtained to proceed.

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was identified in the holding room, and the operative site was marked. The patient underwent a regional nerve block by the anesthesiologist in the holding area. The patient was then transferred to the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table. General anesthesia was induced. Preoperative antibiotics were administered. The patient was placed in the beach-chair position. The left upper extremity was positioned, prepped, and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A preoperative time-out was performed.

The left glenohumeral joint was insufflated with normal saline. The posterior portal was established, and the arthroscope was placed into the glenohumeral joint. The anterior portal was established using spinal needle localization. A diagnostic arthroscopy was then begun. The full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon was confirmed. The subscapularis and infraspinatus tendons were overall intact.

The infraspinatus tendon did have some partial chronic articular-sided tearing off of the small portion of the greater tuberosity. There was no full-thickness tear of the infraspinatus tendon. The long head of the biceps tendon had some areas of tendinosis and fraying. There was a small superior labral tear. Additionally, extensive erythema and tissue inflammation/irritation was present at the biceps anchor on the superior labrum. Therefore, the decision was made to ultimately proceed with the biceps tenodesis. The radioablation of the biceps was used to divide the long head of the biceps tendon off of its attachments in the superior labrum.

Some grade 2 chondromalacia was present on some areas of the glenoid. This was debrided with a shaver. The small superior labral tear was debrided with a shaver.

The arthroscope was then placed into the subacromial space. The lateral portal was established in the standard fashion. The areas of inflamed and thickened subacromial bursa were present. The subacromial bursal tissue was debrided with the shaver. The undersurface of the acromial process was delineated with the radioablation device. An anterior subacromial spur was present. The arthroscopic bur was utilized to remove 5-mm of anterior acromial bone, performing an acromioplasty and achieving the subacromial decompression.

The bur was then utilized to lightly decorticate the rotator cuff footprint on the greater tuberosity. The supraspinatus tendon was mobilized. A rotator cuff repair was then performed with an Arthrex SpeedBridge construct, utilizing a total of four anchors. Successful and secure repair of the supraspinatus tendon was achieved. The arthroscopic instruments were then removed.

Attention was turned towards the open biceps tenodesis. A longitudinal incision was made on the anterior axillary region of the upper arm. The dissection was carried down through the superficial and deep tissue layers. The long head of biceps tendon was identified and retrieved out of the wound. A FiberLoop suture was used to whipstitch the tendon in the standard fashion. The anterior cortex of the humerus was exposed underneath the pectoralis major tendon. A bicortical guidepin was inserted. Unicortical reamer was utilized to create a tunnel in the anterior cortex of the humerus. Copious irrigation was performed.

The excess portion of the long head of the biceps tendon was divided beyond the whipstitching point. The cortical button was deployed in a bicortical fashion across the far cortex of the humerus. The button was toggled, and the sutures were advanced, docking the long head of the biceps tendon within the bony tunnel. A free needle was used to pass one of the suture limbs through the substance of the biceps tendon. Knots were tied down securely, completing the open biceps tenodesis.

The surgical sites were irrigated with normal saline. Hemostasis was verified. Vancomycin powder was applied topically at the surgical sites. Layered closures were performed, and sterile dressings were applied. The patient was awoken from anesthesia and transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. He tolerated the procedure well, and there were no complications. Sponge, needle, and instrument counts were correct at the end of the procedure.
 
29827
29826
23430
29823

OR

29827
29826
23430

OR

29827
29823
23430

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:

1. Left shoulder rotator cuff tear.

2. Left shoulder long head of biceps tendinitis.

3. Left shoulder superior labral tear.

4. Evaluate for left shoulder chondromalacia.

5. Left shoulder subacromial bursitis.

6. Left shoulder subacromial impingement.


POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:

1. Left shoulder rotator cuff tear.

2. Left shoulder long head of biceps tendinitis.

3. Left shoulder superior labral tear.

4. Left shoulder chondromalacia.

5. Left shoulder subacromial bursitis.

6. Left shoulder subacromial impingement.

PROCEDURES PERFORMED:

1. Left shoulder arthroscopy, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

2. Left shoulder arthroscopic extensive debridement, including debridement of superior labrum, chondral tissue, and subacromial bursa.

3. Left shoulder arthroscopic subacromial decompression/acromioplasty.

4. Left shoulder open subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: The patient sustained injury to his left shoulder resulting in a full-thickness rotator cuff tear of the supraspinatus tendon. Additional pathology has been identified as detailed above. The patient has been indicated for left shoulder arthroscopy with rotator cuff repair, debridement, subacromial decompression, and possible open biceps tenodesis. The risks and benefits of the procedure have been explained to the patient in detail, and informed consent was obtained to proceed.

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was identified in the holding room, and the operative site was marked. The patient underwent a regional nerve block by the anesthesiologist in the holding area. The patient was then transferred to the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table. General anesthesia was induced. Preoperative antibiotics were administered. The patient was placed in the beach-chair position. The left upper extremity was positioned, prepped, and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A preoperative time-out was performed.

The left glenohumeral joint was insufflated with normal saline. The posterior portal was established, and the arthroscope was placed into the glenohumeral joint. The anterior portal was established using spinal needle localization. A diagnostic arthroscopy was then begun. The full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon was confirmed. The subscapularis and infraspinatus tendons were overall intact.

The infraspinatus tendon did have some partial chronic articular-sided tearing off of the small portion of the greater tuberosity. There was no full-thickness tear of the infraspinatus tendon. The long head of the biceps tendon had some areas of tendinosis and fraying. There was a small superior labral tear. Additionally, extensive erythema and tissue inflammation/irritation was present at the biceps anchor on the superior labrum. Therefore, the decision was made to ultimately proceed with the biceps tenodesis. The radioablation of the biceps was used to divide the long head of the biceps tendon off of its attachments in the superior labrum.

Some grade 2 chondromalacia was present on some areas of the glenoid. This was debrided with a shaver. The small superior labral tear was debrided with a shaver.

The arthroscope was then placed into the subacromial space. The lateral portal was established in the standard fashion. The areas of inflamed and thickened subacromial bursa were present. The subacromial bursal tissue was debrided with the shaver. The undersurface of the acromial process was delineated with the radioablation device. An anterior subacromial spur was present. The arthroscopic bur was utilized to remove 5-mm of anterior acromial bone, performing an acromioplasty and achieving the subacromial decompression.

The bur was then utilized to lightly decorticate the rotator cuff footprint on the greater tuberosity. The supraspinatus tendon was mobilized. A rotator cuff repair was then performed with an Arthrex SpeedBridge construct, utilizing a total of four anchors. Successful and secure repair of the supraspinatus tendon was achieved. The arthroscopic instruments were then removed.

Attention was turned towards the open biceps tenodesis. A longitudinal incision was made on the anterior axillary region of the upper arm. The dissection was carried down through the superficial and deep tissue layers. The long head of biceps tendon was identified and retrieved out of the wound. A FiberLoop suture was used to whipstitch the tendon in the standard fashion. The anterior cortex of the humerus was exposed underneath the pectoralis major tendon. A bicortical guidepin was inserted. Unicortical reamer was utilized to create a tunnel in the anterior cortex of the humerus. Copious irrigation was performed.

The excess portion of the long head of the biceps tendon was divided beyond the whipstitching point. The cortical button was deployed in a bicortical fashion across the far cortex of the humerus. The button was toggled, and the sutures were advanced, docking the long head of the biceps tendon within the bony tunnel. A free needle was used to pass one of the suture limbs through the substance of the biceps tendon. Knots were tied down securely, completing the open biceps tenodesis.

The surgical sites were irrigated with normal saline. Hemostasis was verified. Vancomycin powder was applied topically at the surgical sites. Layered closures were performed, and sterile dressings were applied. The patient was awoken from anesthesia and transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. He tolerated the procedure well, and there were no complications. Sponge, needle, and instrument counts were correct at the end of the procedure.
You can't count the subacromial decompression towards 29826 AND 29823. If I am reading this correctly your provider wants to bill both 29826 and 29823. If so, I would ask why they feel that way. Code 29823 is not always being paid by insurance. It can be hit or miss.
 
Can depend on the health plan being billed. Does the surgeon really want to "bill all the codes" or was there just a list of CPT codes next to the procedure header? Are your surgeries coded "from scratch" by coders? I have seen a lot of times where the CPTs are just auto-populated next to a procedure header but it is up to you to code it.

Biceps tenodesis: 23430
Glenoid chondromalacia, superior labral tear debridement, and any other debridement of structures repaired as part of 23430 or 29827: Included.
Acromioplasty/SAD: 29826
RCR: 29827

Many payers are not covering 29826. Check the policy of the health plan being billed.

Reputable and official references to use: CPT and descriptions of 29822/29823 "discrete structures", CMS NCCI Manual and P2P edits, AAOS GSD, running it through an edit checker such as Encoder Pro, Codify, CodeX or Clear Claim Connection depending on payer (Availity).

CMS NCCI: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
4. With 3 exceptions (which are described in Chapter IV, Section E (Arthroscopy), Subsection 7), an NCCI PTP edit code pair consisting of 2 codes describing 2 shoulder arthroscopy procedures shall not be bypassed with an NCCI PTP-associated modifier when the 2 procedures are performed on the ipsilateral shoulder. This type of edit may be bypassed with an NCCI PTP-associated modifier only if the 2 procedures are performed on contralateral shoulders.

7. Shoulder arthroscopy procedures include limited debridement (e.g., CPT code 29822) even if the limited debridement is performed in a different area of the same shoulder than the other procedure. With 3 exceptions, shoulder arthroscopy procedures include extensive debridement (e.g., CPT code 29823) even if the extensive debridement is performed in a different area of the same shoulder than the other procedure. CPT codes 29824 (Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; distal claviculectomy including distal articular surface (Mumford procedure)), 29827 (Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; with rotator cuff repair), and 29828 (Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; biceps tenodesis) may be reported separately with CPT code 29823 if the extensive debridement is performed in a different area of the same shoulder.

19. With 3 exceptions (Chapter IV, Section E, Subsection 7) an NCCI PTP edit code pair consisting of 2 codes describing 2 shoulder procedures shall not be bypassed with an NCCI PTP-associated modifier when performed on the ipsilateral shoulder. This type of edit may be bypassed only if the 2 procedures are performed on contralateral shoulders.
 
Use the search box on the top right of the forums and check Dr. Raizman's commentary about these procedures.
Example: https://www.aapc.com/discuss/thread...f-billing-29826.204735/?view=date#post-560697
 
29827, 29826, 23430 is ALL you can bill. 29823 is not supported.

The only structure debrided that was not part of another code is the glenoid cartilage. Any superior labral debridement counts towards the tenodesis only. Any cuff debridement and any bursal debridement for visualization counts towards the cuff repair. 29822 is included in every other scope code.

Many payors will not pay 29826 because of a lack of medical necessity. The literature is pretty solid on it having no effect on outcomes and being unnecessary. We still do it because it takes ten seconds and you need to clear the bursa to do the cuff anyway, but there's a growing sense amongst insurers that it should not be reimbursed.
 
Top