Wiki Surgery coding help

shobaram

Contributor
Messages
11
Location
Naperville, IL
Best answers
0
Can some one please help with this coding,

Pre and post dx: severe lumbar stenosis, gait disorder, severe lumbar pain, failed conservative measures, and severe facet arthropathy

Procedure performed:1. OPen L2-L3 and L3-L4 TLIF combined with posterior fusion with local autograft and allograft.

2. placement of titanium cage at the L2-3 level anteriorly and 2 PEEK cages at the L3-4 level bialterally, use of pedicle screw instrumentation bilaterally at L2,L3 and L4.

3. L2-3 and L3-4 bilateraly laminectomy and Gill procedure at L2-3 and L3-4 beyond that which was necessary for the TLIF,use of nerve monitoring, use of interaoperative fluroscopy.


Findings: chronic and acute herniated disk at the midline at L2-3 severe bilateral facet arthropathy with facet arthropathy causing far lateral neural foraminal stenosis.

Technique: This pt who is progressed to an inability to walk much more than 100 feet or so at a time. He has severe back pain, neurogenic claudication radiating lower extremity pain, and very severe stenosis at L2-3 and L3-4 on the MRI. The pt does have autofushion at L4-L5 and therefore a different doctor may use a different numbering system.

Description of the procedure: The pt was taken to the operating room, induced and intubated without difficulty, placed in the prone position. A posterior aspect of the back was prepped and draped in sterile fashion. A linear incision was made and dissection was carried down to the bony anatomy in the subperiosteal fashion. Self retaining retractors were applied. Dissection was carried all the way out to the transverse processes bilaterally. The facets were quite huge. After the retractors were in place and the bony anatomy was exposed. Using a high speed drill bit and various size kerrison rongeurs, a radical laminectomy was fashioned at L2-3 and L3-4. This dissection was carried out laterally to fashion a Gill laminectomy at each level. The superior facet of L3 and the superior facet of L4 bilaterally ascended quite high and both on MRI and intraoperatively appeared to cause severe neural compression bilaterally in the foramen and quite laterally in the foramen and extra foraminally. This was the reasoning behind doing an extensive lateral dissection through the facet bilaterally at each level. A high speed drill bit was used for the majority of this dissection. Much of the local autograft was collected for lateral use. The lamina spinous process was also removed with rongerurs. The underlying ligamentum flavum was identified. Much of it was quite calcified or ossified and adherent to the dura. A great deal of care was needed to dissect the ossified ligament off the dura without causing a CSF leak. At no time did an incidental durotomy occur. After the lamina was well decompressed, dissection was then continued to the facets as described above. The nerve roots were identified at each level. The facets were completely removed. After all the decompression was completed, the disk space on the left side at L3-4 was opened with a knife and various rongeurs. A radical diskectomy was fashioned on the left side at L3-4, an appropriate sized PEEK cage was placed into the intervertebral space after being packed with local autograft and allograft. A curved cage was used at the L2-3 level and passed down to the very anterior aspect of the disk space, completing the TLIF. There was noted a very adherent chronic and acute disk herniation noted at the midline L2-3. A great deal of time was spent trying to decompress this and teased off the dura, but it was quite adherent. Such a good decompression was had posteriorly that a ramnant of the disk was left behind given its medial location. After this was completed, pedicle screws were placed in the left side pedicles at L2,L3 and L4 by drilling and tapping first. Good trajectories were noted on the X ray. Attention was then directed to the right side where a further diskectomy was fashioned on the right side of L3-4. Again, various sized disk shavers and curettes were used to further the diskectomy. After this was completed, again a PEEK cage was placed into the intervertebral space and confirmed on fluoroscopy. Again, this was packed with local autograft and allograft as well as the disk space proper. This appeared to distract the disk space small degree. After this was completed, the pedicle screws were then placed into the L2,L3, and L4 levels on the right side as well. The pedicles were compressed and appropriately size rods were placed and then the set screws were final tightened. After this was completed, the wound was irrigated with saline irrigant. The posterior elements were decorticated with a high speed drill bit. A remnant autograft and allograft were used in the posterior location between the transverse processes and between the remaining facet complexes. Anterior and posterior X rays were also obtained and showed good trajectory of the screws. After this was completed, the posterior fusion was completed. The wound was closed in interrupted fashion with Vicryl sutures and staples. A drain was placed subfascially and submuscularly and secured in place with a single suture. Sterile dressing was applied. The pt was taken back to the postanesthesia recovery in stable condition.

is the coding 22633, 63012 - 59(Gill type procedure) , 22853 X 3,20931 and 20936.

Thanks in advance
 
Hi :), in your report, I see the following codes: 22633 (L2-L3 combined fusion); 22634 x1 (L3-L4 combined fusion); 22853 x2 (cage at L2-L3 and cage at L3-L4); 22842 (posterior segmental instrumentation at L2-L4); 20930 (morselized allograft); and 20936 (morselized autograft).

For the fusion, you get one code per interspace where combined fusion was performed which is why you can add 22634. NCCI edits currently bundle 63012 into 22633, and CMS policy typically only allows the 59 modifier on this code and other laminectomy codes like 63047/63042 when performed at a different level in the spine (e.g., combined fusion at L3-L4 with laminectomy at L1-L2). You may want to discuss the 63012 with your insurance carrier if the patient has insurance other than Medicare (I know the AMA and AANS have stated you may not report 63047 or 63042 at the same level as 22633 or 22630 but they have not specifically addressed 63012 to point).

For the cages, you may report 1 unit of 22853 "per interspace" (so in this case you get 2 units - one for the L2-L3 level and one for the L3-L4 level). The instrumentation is also billable. You have segmental instrumentation spanning three segments since you have screws at L2, L3, and L4. The allograft appears to be morsellized rather than structural since it's being packed between the transverse processes and the 20936 is for the local autograft as you suggested.

I hope that helps!
 
Can you please help with one more question. Is there any code for bone biopsy? In this report several biopsies were performed following the previous month procedure.

Patient had a previous procedure a month ago: an open subtotal biopsy of mass and exploration of painful lump, dissection down to patient's dura and removal of a small portion of eroded skull defect with a Dx code of right temporal painful mass.


Operation Performed: Right frontotemporal craniotomy and resection of mass, biopsy of mass, biopsy of temporalis muscle, biopsy of dura, biopsy of bone.

Placement of ventricular catheter for sampling of cerebrospinal fluid through separate bur hole made with high-speed drill bit.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring.

Computer navigation.

Technique: This is a 63-year-old male, who had an abrupt onset of pain in his right temple, showing an obvious mass on the scan and a lump visibly. He was taken to the OR on his previous admission where this whole area was biopsied through a small temple incision. This unfortunately ________ , the tissue sent was inconclusive even though the biopsy was completed immediately in the area of swelling. The bone was also removed at the previous operation as well as a small amount of the dura. On followup, this patient's MRI demonstrated worsening findings with brain enhancement and some vasogenic edema. Concern was for malignancy given the spread into the brain and recommendation was made for open craniotomy and larger more definitive biopsy of the above tissue. The risks, indications, options, and benefits were discussed with the patient's family members at length prior to surgery. The patient was taken to the operating room, induced and intubated by Anesthesia without difficulty, placed in the supine position, placed in Mayfield pins, and the computer navigation system was registered. The patient was not given antibioitics to ensure appropriate cultures. A curvilinear incision was made over right frontotemporal area in the usual way and myocutaneous flap was reflected anteriorly during stealth navigation. The enhancing mass in temporalis muscle was identified, appeared visually abnormal as well. This was biopsied in several small pieces. The dissection was then carried down to the pterion and the temporalis muscle was reflected further to expose the bony aspect distal to the bony defect inferiorly. after this was completed, a high-speed drill bit was used to fashion 2 bur holes and a craniotomy flap was turned using bony defect identified. The underlying dura appeared abnormal and there appeared to be a separate new defect in the skull anterior to previous dissection. This dura was biopsied as well. There was a fair amount of bleeding from sphenoid bone where the abnormal soft tissue mass appeared to be emanating from. After this dura was biopsied, the dura was then reflected to expose the underlying brain. There appeared to be continuation of the soft tissue mass emanating out of the sphenoid bone through the dura into the brain. This was biopsied. Multiple pieces of all of these specimens were sent for frozen sectioning including the abnormal bone. Unfortunately, the preliminary diagnosis was inconclusive with no malignancy being identified. However, no other obvious abnormalities were seen except for some possible meningothelial hyperplasia on the dural specimens. The bony abnormalitiy appeared to erode the lateral wall of the orbit in a very small area, approximately 2 mm. After this was completed, the stealth system was used to identify the abnormal enhancing areas of the brain. There were essentially 2 areas, one was immediately underneath the abnormal dura and soft tissue mass more anteriorly, and then there was a deeper area more posteriorly that seemed to follow in a sulcus. Multiple specimens of this area were resected and some of the specimens were also sent to pathology and again no malignancy is seen. This area was confirmed with accurate stealth several times. Prior to the opening, of the craniotomy, a small bur hole was made over the right frontal area and a ventricular catheter was placed to approximate depth of 6cm to sample the CSF. This was done to ensure approximate testing prior to opening the craniotomy. The fluid appeared somewhat yellow consistent with old blood, however, this was a very mild finding. This fluid was sent for cytology as well as routine studies. After nof urther abnormal tissue could be identified, some bone was was placed over the sphenoid wing defect. The dura was closed with a synthetic dural graft as much of the dura was sent to Pathology for sectioning. There was an abnormal thickened area of dura that appeared consistent with a tumor that was previously no tidentified on the MRI that was in the sylvian fissure near the apex of the sphenoid bone. this was also resected and sent to Pathology for permanent sectioning. After the dura was closed, then a dural sealant was used to cover the edges. after this was completed, the bone was placed back in its original position and held in place with titanium fixation plates. A small drain was placed submuscularly. The wound was closed in an interrupted fashion. Sterile dressing was applied. The patient was taken back to postanesthesia recovery in stable condition.

Is the coding 61140 - 22 mod, 20205 - biopsy of muscle(not sure if this is correct) and 61107 or for Extra ventricular drain.

Thanks in advance
 
You're welcome :) - glad I could help! On this second case, this is an interesting procedure. After creating the burr holes, the physician mentions "turning a craniotomy flap" so I would actually report a code for craniotomy rather than burr hole access into the brain. There is no code that expressly describes craniotomy with biopsy in its description in CPT, but it is generally accepted practice to report 61304 for a craniotomy with exploration when a craniotomy with biopsy is performed. Here is a link to a Q&A on Karen Zupko's website advocating use of 61304 for a craniotomy with biopsies (Karen Zupko is a well-respected consultant in the fields of neurosurgery, ENT, and orthopedics): https://www.karenzupko.com/craniotomy-for-biopsy/. I would also add CPT 61781 to capture the stereotactic navigation for this craniotomy procedure since the craniotomy codes don't have combination codes for a biopsy with stereotactic navigation like the 61104 code we have when a biopsy is performed through burr holes with stereotactic navigation

For the other biopsies "en route" to the deeper surgical field (biopsies of the muscle, bone, and dura) I would actually consider those biopsies bundled since this is actually one very large mass extending from the muscle layer of the scalp down through the skull/dura and into the brain (so one lesion = one surgical field essentially). When we consider this all one mass, we would report the most extensive procedure performed on this single mass which is a craniotomy with biopsy of the brain or the 61304. I would consider a modifier 22 on 61304 for increased complexity due to the size of the mass, the recent surgery in the area, and the difficulty obtaining adequate specimens/tissue diagnosis in this case.

I hope that helps!

Have a good day
Kim

www.codingmastery.com
 
Thank you Kim. I need a clarification regarding the code 61104. Have you mentioned about 61140? So the coding should be 61304 - 22,61781,61140 (it is okay to code in addition to 61304 or no) and provider mentioned about additional EVD?. Please reply.

Thanks again.
 
You're welcome! For 61140, no you cannot report that in addition to 61304 because they are doing one approach. They use the burr holes to turn a craniotomy flap and then the biopsies happen through the open craniotomy not through burr holes. So the burr holes are just a means to create that craniotomy flap and aren't coded separately. I would code the 61304.22 only to represent the biopsy not 61304 and 61140 together. You can code the the EVD catheter insertion since they placed it through a separate burr hole and not into the surgical field through the craniotomy flap, but since they place a ventricular catheter through a burr hole not through a twist drill hole, I would go with 61210.59 instead of 61107.

Let me know if you have any additional questions.

Thanks
Kim
www.codingmastery.com
 
Top