• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Suspected Fracture Coding

sorcha48

Networker
Messages
71
Location
Gladwin, MI
Best answers
0
I have a provider that used a dx of fracture when the fracture had not been verified as of the day that the visit occured. An x-ray was done and stated no fracture.

I explained that you could not use fracture unless it had been confirmed.

She stated it was "in her opinion" a fracture which was confirmed 2 days later during a CT scan.

She entered in her notes 3 days after the visit.

What should be coded? For the encounter.
 
I have a provider that used a dx of fracture when the fracture had not been verified as of the day that the visit occured. An x-ray was done and stated no fracture.

I explained that you could not use fracture unless it had been confirmed.

She stated it was "in her opinion" a fracture which was confirmed 2 days later during a CT scan.

She entered in her notes 3 days after the visit.

What should be coded? For the encounter.

You are correct-we do not code 'suspected', 'probable' or 'rule-out' diagnosis. See the 10 Steps to Correct Coding in the ICD-9 Guidelines to help prove this to your physician. For the initial encounter, before the CT confirmed the fracture, I would use leg pain (or whatever site it was) with an E code for the cause of injury if known. :)
 
Top