If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
I just came out of a meeting with Family Practice Drs and they had a question regarding up coding their E/M due to patient needing translating. It is more TIME consuming so if they document their time is that acceptable??
I just came out of a meeting with Family Practice Drs and they had a question regarding up coding their E/M due to patient needing translating. It is more TIME consuming so if they document their time is that acceptable??
Any time they document that the face to face time with the patient was more than 50% of the total visit, then time can be used as a key factor for assigned level of service. I would not make a practice of doing this on every patient who requires a translator as each visit will be very different.
The visit can be coded based on time if counseling and/or coordination of care dominates - not just that face-to-face time was more than 50%.
If all that time was just a regular visit - not extra counseling/CofC, and the extra time was because of translation, that might not qualify.