• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki ultrasounds

Korbc

Expert
Messages
399
Location
Uncasville , CT
Best answers
0
hey there,

I just wanted to double check if our provider initiates an ultrasound but cannot visibly find our see what they are looking for due to adhesions etc, etc, and they get referred out for a more in depth ultrasound can I can still bill for it and without a 53? I assume I can, but just wanted to double check. Thanks!
 
I do not think -53 would be appropriate for an ultrasound that was completely performed and read, but for various reasons didn't give the clinical information needed. As long as the documentation explains this, I would bill without -53.
In our practice, occasionally we have a patient that is unable to tolerate a vaginal probe. In a situation like that, -53 may be warranted if they were able to get at least 1 view and procedure was discontinued due to patient discomfort. In a situation where we were trying to evaluate an ovarian cyst, but the patient had excessive gas or something that otherwise precluded a good view, I would still bill the full 76830.
 
Top