Is it appropriate for an UC provider to bill 92002 (LT) (Note - modifier is invalid) with a diagnosis code 918.1? This is a medical doctor and not an ophthalmologist. 
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki Urgent Care MD performing 92002
- Thread starter scar5901
- Start date
vpcats
Guest
Why doesn't he use a E/M code? The 92 codes are EYE codes but I'm sure they are not limited to ophthalmology. Any specialty could use them but it would look funny to me if a gyn used a Eye code. 
ANDREAHSANCHEZ
Guest
- Messages
- 25
- Best answers
- 0
I bill for urgent cares 4-5 different ones and no i have never seen this and would say no. 918.1 is corneal abrasion i just had one of these today and if he wants to bill this because of a fluorescein eye scan it is a bundled charge. You bill ov at the level which would include the amount of work prefomed 992xx.