• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Using RT/LT vs. FA,F1,etc.....

Messages
107
Location
Richwood, NJ
Best answers
0
Is there any set rule when to use modifiers F1, F2 versus RT and LT when coding for the hand/fingers? Thanks.
 
I have a hand surgeon and the "F" modifiers are frequently used and paid without a hitch. As for RT/LT, I use these for carpal tunnel sugery (as an example) to denote which hand. If it's a bilateral procedure, it becomes carrier specific (in my case) and I use RT/LT or 50...whichever they prefer.
 
Basic rule: Code the greatest degree of specificity. I always interpreted that to include the F, T modifiers as well. When the information is available, I can find no logical reason to defer to more general modifiers (50, RT, etc).

I'm not sure this helps, but hope so.
 
I use the F and T modifier's for my fractures because if you are dealing with more that one digit the claim will probably deny as duplicate if you aren't more specific.
 
RT/LT versus F and T modifiers

So I could use an "F" modifier if say the Doc repairs fractures to the metacarpals of the left long and ring finger or the metacarpalphalangeal joints? This is where I get hung up. Thank you all for your help!!
 
So I could use an "F" modifier if say the Doc repairs fractures to the metacarpals of the left long and ring finger or the metacarpalphalangeal joints? This is where I get hung up. Thank you all for your help!!

Yes, you would use F2 and F3, i'm assuming the long finger is the middle finger ?
 
Top