• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

UT Medicaid Urine Drug Testing Carve-out

andersona1229

Networker
Messages
33
Location
New London, CT
I know this is a rather specific question so even if you have any input that would be fantastic. I've been going back and forth for the last 5-6 years with MCOs in Utah about the substance use disorder (SUD) carve out for UDT. The only place the carve-out is mentioned is in a MIB from April 2018 announcing the policy; it doesn't appear in any of their other manuals. It states that if a claim has the diagnosis codes F10.00-F19.99 as first listed/primary diagnosis with any of the presumptive & definitive drug testing CPTs it is payable by state Medicaid. All other diagnosis codes are still payable by the MCOs.

It took me a good 2-3 years to get Select Health onboard with understanding that they have to pay even if it is a non-SUD F code (think F90.9) on the claim. Right after I get that taken care of, Molina starts denying all UDT saying that all UDT is carved out to the state. They even went back and recouped about a years worth of claims for it. I've appealed multiple times including a denied UT Medicaid EOB saying that they're responsible and a copy of the bulletin explaining the policy. Each of those appeals has been denied. They recently started trying to cite a policy in the "2022 Utah Medicaid Provider Manual" saying that everything is carved out to the state. There is nothing it the manual regarding any carve-outs for UDT. I have no idea what they're talking about.

I'm in the process of appealing another claim and then escalating it as high as I can. I had to stop working on the original appeals process because of the disastrous NCCI edit situation. I wanted to check and see if anybody else has seen this before or has any suggestions. I think I've done everything right here but maybe I'm missing something? I don't know.

Thanks yall. :)
 
Top