• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Veinpuncture and New Patient E/M

jessicawrenn

Guest
Messages
1
Best answers
0
Hi! Our office has new patients schedule for fasting lab work and then schedule for a later date for a new patient appointment. This way, our office has their lab results back to discuss a treatment plan at the new patient appointment. On lab work appointments, no E/Ms are billed, only the veinpuncture and the appropriate lab tests. For the new patient office visit, a new patient E/M code is billed.

I received a letter today where insurance is trying to recoup payment for the new patient E/M stating that patient is not new, but established. These patients are new to the practice and have not been seen by a provider! Per my code books, a new patient E/M is correct. Have any of you encountered this before? What's the correct answer? Thanks in advance!
 
I'm assuming the insurance company feels a relationship has been established since your Physician has ordered and billed for lab services. The patient is no longer considered "new" to the practice. I have never experienced this but I'm certain that because they see a service has been provided (venipuncture and lab tests), they feel a relationship has been established and this patient is no longer new to the practice.
 
Personally, I would appeal their decision. The patient actually hasn't had an "evaluation and management" visit yet, so the new patient code is applicable. I worked at a PCP office for several years and never had any trouble with such.

Good luck!
Lena
 
Unfortunately, the payer is correct. The venipuncture is a face-to-face service, which prevents your MD from billing a new patient visit when the patient returns for initial E/M/results. The CPT guideline is that if any face-to-face service (not just E/M services) is performed, you cannot bill a new patient visit for that provider/dept for the next 3 years.
 
I, respectfully, disagree

Unfortunately, the payer is correct. The venipuncture is a face-to-face service, which prevents your MD from billing a new patient visit when the patient returns for initial E/M/results. The CPT guideline is that if any face-to-face service (not just E/M services) is performed, you cannot bill a new patient visit for that provider/dept for the next 3 years.

I, respectfully, disagree.

the venipuncture is NOT face-to-face with the provider.

per CPT guidelines:
"Solely for the purposes of distinguishing between new and established patients, professional services are those face-to-face services rendered by physicians and other qualified health care professionals who may report evaluation and management services reported by a specific CPT code(s)."

a phlebotomist cannot "report an e/m service", therefore this would not disqualify a patient from being considered "new".

having said that, we strongly encourage our providers to see the patient before ordering labs and it is very rare in our practice for a patient to have labs before being seen by the provider.

:)
 
You might seek assistance from the AMA CPT staff on this. A similar question about reading of x-rays was answered in CPT Assistant of October 2011 that used the definition of face-to-face time to explain why the patient would be new even if the physician had previously provided the x-ray interpretation and report. I don't believe that clinical staff services would meet the face-to-face professional service definition.
 
Top