• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
  • Important Note: We will be performing a scheduled maintenance on 1st November 2020. The site will be offline from 7:30PM (MT) till midnight. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

58 or 78

aguelfi

Guest
Messages
332
Location
Port Charlotte, FL
Best answers
0
I have a request for a refund on my desk for a patient who had a axillary node bx (38525 & 38792) abou 14 days after an excision an excision of breast lesion (19125). I used a 78 modifier because the op-note doesn't specify that the bx was a planned return to the OR, however I do see how it could be necessary to use a 58. We can't determine if the patient was going to return to OR until the results from the lesion removal are back. I'm interested to see what others think if they would use a 58, 78 or even something else. Should I appeal this?
 

cmartin

Guru
Messages
204
Best answers
0
I think you could make an argument for either -58 or -79, but I definitely wouldn't use a -78 in that case. I'm surprised that they'd ask for a refund on the basis of what they consider to be inappropriate use of a -78, tho.
C.Martin
CPC-GENSG
 
Top