• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

611.3 Fat Necrosis of Breast

N

Nichole9288

Guest
Messages
22
Location
Green Bay, WI
We have a patient who was seen for a fat necrosis of her breast, status post breast reduction. The surgeon and patient decided upon an incisional breast biopsy to evaluate & diagnose the breast lump. (Past the 90 day global period).
The diagnosis on the pathology report came back as 611.3 (fat necrosis breast).
The insurer is kicking back our claim stating we can't bill 611.3 as the primary dx because the ICD9 book states "code first 996.79 breast necrosis due to breast graft).

Well, the patient didn't have an implant or graft.


What should we do in this case?

Thanks, Nichole:confused:
 
sign or symptom

I would use breast lump/mass, 611.72, since it sounds like that is what her chief complaint was when she came in. If you had sent the claim before the path came back that is all you would have been able to use.
 
I do believe you are correct since that is the highest degree of certainty.
I am very confused by these codes. I can kind of understand why it would need a primary diagnosis because the fat necrosis was probably casued by trauma d/t her surgery but that just does not fit the code descriptor at all. I am at a loss. Sorry. I would love to hear some suggestion from others though.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top