• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki A Tick Is Not An Insect!

dgunn

Contributor
Messages
10
Location
Mena, AR
Best answers
0
W57.XXXA should be the appropriate code for a tick bite, but payers are not paying as a primary dx. Technically a tick is an arthropod and not an insect (because it has 8 legs and not 6.) For this reason, I have been hesitant to use a different code (such as the S codes for insect bite.) If rash is documented, I have listed that as the primary followed by the W57 code.

Any suggestions on what to do if 'Tick bite' is both the symptom and diagnosis - that is if rash or edema is not documented?

Thanks
 
I've always felt that treatment for a tick bite is not actually for the bite itself but for the suspected exposure to the diseases that it carries, so if the provider documents that as the reason, I could suggest you could try using Z20.818 for 'contact with and (suspected) exposure to other bacterial diseases'. Not sure whether or not that would help from a payment standpoint.
 
W57.XXXA should be the appropriate code for a tick bite, but payers are not paying as a primary dx. Technically a tick is an arthropod and not an insect (because it has 8 legs and not 6.) For this reason, I have been hesitant to use a different code (such as the S codes for insect bite.) If rash is documented, I have listed that as the primary followed by the W57 code.

Any suggestions on what to do if 'Tick bite' is both the symptom and diagnosis - that is if rash or edema is not documented?

Thanks

Codes that begin with V, W, X, or Y ( chapter 20) can never be used as principle diagnosis codes. You can use the S40.- code for superficial bite as the first listed code.
 
Tick Bite

I've always felt that treatment for a tick bite is not actually for the bite itself but for the suspected exposure to the diseases that it carries, so if the provider documents that as the reason, I could suggest you could try using Z20.818 for 'contact with and (suspected) exposure to other bacterial diseases'. Not sure whether or not that would help from a payment standpoint.

I absolutely agree with you. That is a great code for that encounter.

Thanks again.

Marianne CPC
 
I've always felt that treatment for a tick bite is not actually for the bite itself but for the suspected exposure to the diseases that it carries, so if the provider documents that as the reason, I could suggest you could try using Z20.818 for 'contact with and (suspected) exposure to other bacterial diseases'. Not sure whether or not that would help from a payment standpoint.

I don't think you can assume the reason they are seeking treatment unless stated. It could be infected or many other reasons. I would only code what is documented.

I agree with Debra's response.
 
I don't think you can assume the reason they are seeking treatment unless stated. It could be infected or many other reasons. I would only code what is documented.

I agree with Debra's response.


I agree that you have to use what's documented. But it's usually the case that the patient is being seen and treated for the potential infection - the bite injury itself is not usually serious in and of itself. If the provider documents that they prescribing an antibiotic for a tick bite and not stating the rationale that it's either for an active infection or for a prophylaxis to prevent an infection, then there's an opportunity for education and improvement of their documentation.
 
Top