Wiki A/v fistula angiographies-art/ven

Messages
198
Location
Philadelphia, PA
Best answers
0
Hi, Guys,
Can someone help me with this one?
Not sure if I'm to code for both the venous and arterial angioplasties.
I have....36147,36148...and would it be 35475, 35476,59...with their rs&i codes...75962 and 75978?
Thanks so much.


HISTORY: End-stage renal disease with right upper arm fistula

(brachial artery to transposed basilic vein fistula) with

suboptimal dialysis flow via this access. Flows <300mls.


PROCEDURE: Ultrasound evaluation with Doppler was performed to

find a suitable sites for accessing the fistula (of venous

outflow to direct towards the central veins as well as basilic

vein near the axilla to direct access towards arterial

anastomosis.



The skin of the right upper arm was prepped and draped in usual

sterile manner. Under real-time ultrasound guidance access to the

fistula was achieved directed towards the central veins. A

vascular sheath (initially a 6 French subsequently changed to a 7

French) was placed and diagnostic patient either be from the

arterial inflow to the right atrium was performed. Given the

redemonstration of multifocal hemodynamically significant venous

stenoses (>50%) within the mid venous segment of the fistula,

angioplasty was performed with a 7 mm balloon. Involving the more

peripheral of significant venous stenoses, there was difficulty

with resolving continued waist involving this stenosis despite

repeated angioplasty. An additional Bentson wire was placed into

the fistula and passed centrally, and then the site was

reangioplastied with a 7 mm, which successfully resolved waist

around this stenosis. Multiple attempts were also made to

angioplasty the inflow/peripheral venous stenosis with the same 7

mm balloon, however given the landing zone of the sheath which

was erected towards the central veins it was difficult to get a

successful resolution of the stenosis. Completion fistulography

was performed. This vascular sheath was removed and hemostasis

was achieved with woggle technique. Next attention was directed

towards vascular access of the venous outflow near the axilla but

directed towards arterial anastomosis. Using real-time ultrasound

guidance, the venous outflow directed towards the arterial

anastomosis was achieved. A vascular sheath (7 French) was placed

and diagnostic fistulography was performed once the wire and

catheter were used to advance into the brachial artery. This

fistulogram demonstrated hemodynamically significant stenoses

involving the perianastomotic area as well as the peripheral

aspect of the venous inflow of the fistula. Angioplasty of the

peripheral aspect of the venous inflow was performed with a 7 mm

balloon and a perianastomotic arterial stenosis was performed

with a 4 mm mustang balloon. Completion fistulography including

reflux evaluations from this vascular access demonstrated brisk

flow through the fistula without significant stenoses. The

vascular sheath directed towards arterial anastomosis was being

removed, at which time there was transection of the vascular

sheath near the hub resulting in a significant portion of the

catheter to remain behind. This portion of the upper arm was

evaluated with fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance which

confirmed the remnant catheter was within the soft tissues of the

right upper arm. Using fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance, the

residual portion of the catheter was grasped and removed from the

soft tissues successfully. Two woggles were placed along with

manual compression to achieve hemostasis.



As a result of manual compression and time spent achieving the

foreign body from remnant catheter, it was then noted that the

fistula no longer demonstrated a good thrill, therefore this site

was evaluated with ultrasound. This demonstrated acute thrombus

within the fistula, however over time it was noted that thrombus

was improving but given the vulnerability of the access for this

patient, it was determined the thrombus within the fistula should

be addressed immediately.



Real-time ultrasound guidance was used to access the fistula

directed towards the central veins and a vascular sheath was

placed. A diagnostic fistulography was performed which

demonstrated mild or stenosis within the venous outflow which was

recently angioplastied probably a result of a elastic

recoil/residual stenosis in addition to thrombus within the

inflow portion of the fistula. The fistula from the level of the

axilla towards the arterial anastomosis was reangioplastied with

a 7 mm balloon. Post angioplasty/completion facial atrophy

demonstrated resolution of the stenosis and thrombus within the

fistula. The vascular sheath was removed and hemostasis was

achieved with woggle.



Dr. was present for the entire procedure. The patient will

be immediately observed in the radiology recovery suite and then

will be admitted to for observation.



FINDINGS:

Initial ultrasound of the fistula demonstrated patent, and echoic

and compressible vessel with areas of stenoses that correspond to

the recent fistulogram. Redemonstrated two regions of

hemodynamically significant venous stenoses >70% within the mid

venous segment of the fistula. Compression reflux fistulography

demonstrated approximately a 50% stenosis at arterial anastomotic

site as demonstrated on prior examination. The brachial

artery/arterial inflow appears satisfactory. No hemodynamically

significant stenoses are seen within the central veins. Post

angioplasty/completion angiography demonstrates no residual

hemodynamically significant stenoses or thrombus.



Permanent ultrasound and fluoroscopic images were obtained and

stored in the PACS system.



IMPRESSION

IMPRESSION

1. Two areas of >70% stenosis of the basilic outflow vein of the

fistula successfully dilated with high pressure 6 and 7mm

Conquest balloons to supra maximal pressure of 35mmHg.

2. Arterial anastomosis stenosis of approximately 50% dilated

with a 4mm balloon.

3. Significantly improved thrill throughout the whole right upper

arm noted , no pulsatility remaining.









Results
 
Repost...av fistula ven/art angioplasty

Hi, Guys,
Can someone help me with this one?
Not sure if I'm to code for both the venous and arterial angioplasties.
I have....36147,36148...and would it be 35475, 35476,59...with their rs&i codes...75962 and 75978?
Thanks so much.


HISTORY: End-stage renal disease with right upper arm fistula

(brachial artery to transposed basilic vein fistula) with

suboptimal dialysis flow via this access. Flows <300mls.


PROCEDURE: Ultrasound evaluation with Doppler was performed to

find a suitable sites for accessing the fistula (of venous

outflow to direct towards the central veins as well as basilic

vein near the axilla to direct access towards arterial

anastomosis.



The skin of the right upper arm was prepped and draped in usual

sterile manner. Under real-time ultrasound guidance access to the

fistula was achieved directed towards the central veins. A

vascular sheath (initially a 6 French subsequently changed to a 7

French) was placed and diagnostic patient either be from the

arterial inflow to the right atrium was performed. Given the

redemonstration of multifocal hemodynamically significant venous

stenoses (>50%) within the mid venous segment of the fistula,

angioplasty was performed with a 7 mm balloon. Involving the more

peripheral of significant venous stenoses, there was difficulty

with resolving continued waist involving this stenosis despite

repeated angioplasty. An additional Bentson wire was placed into

the fistula and passed centrally, and then the site was

reangioplastied with a 7 mm, which successfully resolved waist

around this stenosis. Multiple attempts were also made to

angioplasty the inflow/peripheral venous stenosis with the same 7

mm balloon, however given the landing zone of the sheath which

was erected towards the central veins it was difficult to get a

successful resolution of the stenosis. Completion fistulography

was performed. This vascular sheath was removed and hemostasis

was achieved with woggle technique. Next attention was directed

towards vascular access of the venous outflow near the axilla but

directed towards arterial anastomosis. Using real-time ultrasound

guidance, the venous outflow directed towards the arterial

anastomosis was achieved. A vascular sheath (7 French) was placed

and diagnostic fistulography was performed once the wire and

catheter were used to advance into the brachial artery. This

fistulogram demonstrated hemodynamically significant stenoses

involving the perianastomotic area as well as the peripheral

aspect of the venous inflow of the fistula. Angioplasty of the

peripheral aspect of the venous inflow was performed with a 7 mm

balloon and a perianastomotic arterial stenosis was performed

with a 4 mm mustang balloon. Completion fistulography including

reflux evaluations from this vascular access demonstrated brisk

flow through the fistula without significant stenoses. The

vascular sheath directed towards arterial anastomosis was being

removed, at which time there was transection of the vascular

sheath near the hub resulting in a significant portion of the

catheter to remain behind. This portion of the upper arm was

evaluated with fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance which

confirmed the remnant catheter was within the soft tissues of the

right upper arm. Using fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance, the

residual portion of the catheter was grasped and removed from the

soft tissues successfully. Two woggles were placed along with

manual compression to achieve hemostasis.



As a result of manual compression and time spent achieving the

foreign body from remnant catheter, it was then noted that the

fistula no longer demonstrated a good thrill, therefore this site

was evaluated with ultrasound. This demonstrated acute thrombus

within the fistula, however over time it was noted that thrombus

was improving but given the vulnerability of the access for this

patient, it was determined the thrombus within the fistula should

be addressed immediately.



Real-time ultrasound guidance was used to access the fistula

directed towards the central veins and a vascular sheath was

placed. A diagnostic fistulography was performed which

demonstrated mild or stenosis within the venous outflow which was

recently angioplastied probably a result of a elastic

recoil/residual stenosis in addition to thrombus within the

inflow portion of the fistula. The fistula from the level of the

axilla towards the arterial anastomosis was reangioplastied with

a 7 mm balloon. Post angioplasty/completion facial atrophy

demonstrated resolution of the stenosis and thrombus within the

fistula. The vascular sheath was removed and hemostasis was

achieved with woggle.



Dr. was present for the entire procedure. The patient will

be immediately observed in the radiology recovery suite and then

will be admitted to for observation.



FINDINGS:

Initial ultrasound of the fistula demonstrated patent, and echoic

and compressible vessel with areas of stenoses that correspond to

the recent fistulogram. Redemonstrated two regions of

hemodynamically significant venous stenoses >70% within the mid

venous segment of the fistula. Compression reflux fistulography

demonstrated approximately a 50% stenosis at arterial anastomotic

site as demonstrated on prior examination. The brachial

artery/arterial inflow appears satisfactory. No hemodynamically

significant stenoses are seen within the central veins. Post

angioplasty/completion angiography demonstrates no residual

hemodynamically significant stenoses or thrombus.



Permanent ultrasound and fluoroscopic images were obtained and

stored in the PACS system.



IMPRESSION

IMPRESSION

1. Two areas of >70% stenosis of the basilic outflow vein of the

fistula successfully dilated with high pressure 6 and 7mm

Conquest balloons to supra maximal pressure of 35mmHg.

2. Arterial anastomosis stenosis of approximately 50% dilated

with a 4mm balloon.

3. Significantly improved thrill throughout the whole right upper

arm noted , no pulsatility remaining.
 
Hi Margaret,
After a quick look I would say just the 35475/75962, 36147, 36148 (you can also add 76937). The graft/fistula is considered one structure, so I wouldn't code the venous PTA

carol :)
 
Carol,
Thanks...I was just worried because of the sites of the venous/arterial angioplasties...book says...if one is central and one is peripheral...was having a hard time deciding....and the arterial should be billed over the venous, correct?...as you posted the code.
 
sorry, did I miss the central PTA? If PTA was done in the subclavian or beyond, you can bill both. You will have to add 59 modifier to 35476. So much fun :)...C
 
Hi Margaret,
After a quick look I would say just the 35475/75962, 36147, 36148 (you can also add 76937). The graft/fistula is considered one structure, so I wouldn't code the venous PTA

carol :)

I agree with Carol. One, not both, and the arterial should be billed as primary. That change was made my SIR several years ago (venous plasty used to be primary).

HTH :)
 
Top