• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Can 23412 still be used??

taylov519

Contributor
Messages
22
Location
Longview, WA
Best answers
0
The doctor did an arthoscopic acromioplasty, arthroscopic distal clavicle excision and also did a mini-open technique. When the doctor did the mini-open RCR; he found that it was irreparable. My question is would I still be able to bill the 23412 using a modifier like -22 because he did not repair it or use the unlisted code for this procedure. Any input would be great. Thanks.
 
The doctor did an arthoscopic acromioplasty, arthroscopic distal clavicle excision and also did a mini-open technique. When the doctor did the mini-open RCR; he found that it was irreparable. My question is would I still be able to bill the 23412 using a modifier like -22 because he did not repair it or use the unlisted code for this procedure. Any input would be great. Thanks.

and he didnt nothing while it was open?

Modifier 22 would not be appropriate as that is for procedures that are more complicated. I am thinking you may have meant -52
 
Yup, you're right; I meant -52. This is what the op says for the rotator cuff-" Excess bursa was debrided fromthe subacroial space, exposing the rotator cuff tear, and it became quite evident that this tear was irreparable." Then he went into closing the incision.
 
Yup, you're right; I meant -52. This is what the op says for the rotator cuff-" Excess bursa was debrided fromthe subacroial space, exposing the rotator cuff tear, and it became quite evident that this tear was irreparable." Then he went into closing the incision.

based on that, I would not bill the 23412 even with a modifier 52. There isnt enough there to support it. You may want to just consider a diagnostic arthrotomy.
 
Top