If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
There has been some debate in our office as to weather a CPC-A needs to have all of their coding signed off and reviewed by a CPC or if they are aloud to code alone. Any advice on this topic would be appreciated.
Thank you
I think that would be up to the individual supervisor. When I was a CPC-A, I was allowed to code without having a CPC or my supervisor (who was a CCS) check behind me. I've honestly never heard of that before. Again, I think it's the personal peference of the supervisor.
Sorry I didn't give a definitive answer on this one but I hope this helps nevertheless.
I have a CPC-H-A working for me who passed her test about 6 months ago. I do not review her coding unless she has specific questions on charts or does not feel comfortable with how a diagnosis code looks. We have chart audits on where a certain percentage of each coders charts are pulled and reviewed for accuracy and I feel this is suffecient for reviewing her coding. I do know of fellow coders who have told me that while having an apprentice status their coding was reviewed by their supervisor 100% so I think it depends on the supervisor and the level of knowledge the coder has.